La Carga Argumentativa Necesaria para Conseguir un Pronunciamiento de Fondo en una Acción Extraordinaria de Protección

Ana Paula Chávez Sanz

doi:10.18272/usfqlwp.23

Preprint / Version 1

The Argumentative Burden Necessary to Obtain a Substantive Statement in an Extraordinary Protection Action

##article.authors##

Ana Paula Chávez Sanz Corte Constitucional del Ecuador

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18272/usfqlwp.23

Keywords:

Argumentative burden, full argument, substantive statement, constitutional law

Abstract

This paper analyzes ruling No. 1967-14-EP/20 issued by the Constitutional Court of Ecuador, which refers to the elements that an allegation must contain to constitute a complete argument. Thus, it will examine the basis for ruling out an allegation if it does not contain the minimum elements necessary for a substantive ruling within an extraordinary protection action.